On Moral Authorities

[FallentoReason]

There's a reason why he's still taught ~2500 years on.

Again, argument from authority. Pathetic.

...the reason being that maybe his logic is sound. Think before you speak.

Aristotle was a philosopher.

I was thinking Socrates. My apologies. Not sure why Aristotle has been brought up, but never mind.

Aristotle came after Plato and corrected many of his errors.

Kant went far beyond Plato.

Agreed.

And yet you don't get me making an argument from authority about Kant. Kant was wrong about a bunch of stuff just like Plato was. He was just less wrong.

Trivial to the discussion at hand.

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Explicate why it's neither. Go.

Because it can be answered with "neither".

"Is God good because he's good or is goodness good because it's Godly?" Can be answered with "Neither".

You are not justifying your reasoning. Explicate.

Neither of you has grasped my basic modal logic here but at least unlike you he's not an idiot.

Are you sure it's not because it fails to be sound philosophy?

You're an idiot. A=A can't be wrong.

Your entire argument was miles away from the OP. Let's not revisit past failures please.

Neither of you knuckleheads would be passing ethics 101 thus far,

Bullshit.

I wish it was.

so I wouldn't be so quick to think you've got a coherent grasp of what you're saying.

You're just too stupid to understand me.

Trololol.

The dilemma gives you options that are mutually exclusive. There is no third option, but for the time being I'm suspending my belief until you can successfully explicate your absurd denial of the dilemma.

You're a fucking moron. I'm not denying the dilemma, I'm saying it's a false one. Learn a little logic and what a false dichotomy is or fuck off.

You're denying it by claiming its false on wrong grounds. Now, actually address the dilemma, or explicate why neither horn is correct. Last chance before I'll have to save you from the embarrassment.