RE: On Moral Authorities
November 16, 2016 at 8:34 am
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2016 at 8:34 am by Edwardo Piet.)
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote:(November 16, 2016 at 8:10 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: Again, argument from authority. Pathetic.
...the reason being that maybe his logic is sound. Think before you speak.
That's not what you said. You made an argument from authority.
Instead of admitting you were wrong you just move the goalposts. You're extremely intellectually dishonest.
Quote:Aristotle came after Plato and corrected many of his errors.
And yet you don't get me making an argument from authority about Kant. Kant was wrong about a bunch of stuff just like Plato was. He was just less wrong.
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Trivial to the discussion at hand.
Your trivial errors are still errors.
Quote:Because it can be answered with "neither".
"Is God good because he's good or is goodness good because it's Godly?" Can be answered with "Neither".
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote: You are not justifying your reasoning. Explicate.
It can be answered with "neither". Grow a brain.
Quote:You're an idiot. A=A can't be wrong.
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote: Your entire argument was miles away from the OP. Let's not revisit past failures please.
Your OP is incoherent bullshit that presupposes A=A and 2+2=4 implicitly and then claims not to explicitly.
As I have said repeatedly: Universes and hypotheticals are based on TLOI, not the other way around.
You want me to explicate but when I do you don't understand.
Quote:Bullshit.
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote: I wish it was.
It is. You claim I'd fail at ethics 101 but you base that on your own inability to understand what I'm talking about.
You're one of those retards who fails to understand something and concludes that the person is talking nonsense rather than try and learn something.
(November 16, 2016 at 8:21 am)FallentoReason Wrote: You're denying it by claiming its false on wrong grounds. Now, actually address the dilemma, or explicate why neither horn is correct. Last chance before I'll have to save you from the embarrassment.
Look, retard, I'm not saying neither horn is correct I'm saying it's a false dichotomy because it can be answered with "neither". The fact that "neither" is even an option makes it a false dichotomy. Learn what a false dichotomy is before pretending to know what it is you disingenuous fucktard.
