Jesus Christ, you sound like a fucking closet theist. I'm only saving you from the embarrassment just this once.
If you knew a single damn thing about the dilemma you're so boldly calling out, is that you'd realise I'm defending a refutation against Divine Command Theory. Had you actually, just for once, logically worked through both horns, you would have concluded neither horn is a good outcome for the theist. And the embarrassment begins when you fucking reply with precisely what the theist would say, because here it is - the only thing that makes it 'neither' is because the theist wants to say it's in god's nature to be good, or some convoluted non-answer.
Congratulations, you just failed ethics 101.
If you knew a single damn thing about the dilemma you're so boldly calling out, is that you'd realise I'm defending a refutation against Divine Command Theory. Had you actually, just for once, logically worked through both horns, you would have concluded neither horn is a good outcome for the theist. And the embarrassment begins when you fucking reply with precisely what the theist would say, because here it is - the only thing that makes it 'neither' is because the theist wants to say it's in god's nature to be good, or some convoluted non-answer.
Congratulations, you just failed ethics 101.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle
