What of this possible scenario:
You live in a small town. There was a murder 5 years ago. The crime is unsolved. A person in your community has an illness and is admitted to the hospital. They have a heart attack. The medical team performs CPR and they are saved. Kept on a medically induced coma for a few days. When they awake they ask to speak to the police. This person reports that while they were in the coma they viewed the Akashic records and saw you commit this unsolved murder. The police arrest you and you are put on trial. You have no alibi since you live alone and no one can vouch for you on that fateful day. You are convicted.
Is this fair? Why not? There is an eyewitness?
Not fair? Perhaps the eyewitness is not credible because they were in a coma?
Of course the eyewitness is not credible. They were in a coma!
You live in a small town. There was a murder 5 years ago. The crime is unsolved. A person in your community has an illness and is admitted to the hospital. They have a heart attack. The medical team performs CPR and they are saved. Kept on a medically induced coma for a few days. When they awake they ask to speak to the police. This person reports that while they were in the coma they viewed the Akashic records and saw you commit this unsolved murder. The police arrest you and you are put on trial. You have no alibi since you live alone and no one can vouch for you on that fateful day. You are convicted.
Is this fair? Why not? There is an eyewitness?
Not fair? Perhaps the eyewitness is not credible because they were in a coma?
Of course the eyewitness is not credible. They were in a coma!
God thinks it's fun to confuse primates. Larsen's God!
