(November 17, 2016 at 8:37 am)Alasdair Ham Wrote: When you say it could be "neither" you are agreeing with me that it's a false dichotomy.
Negative. You were galaxies away from explicating how it's neither. Let me demonstrate: option d, squirrels, just because. Accept it or accept you're wrong.
Quote: I don't have to explain logically why it's neither I never said it was.
YOU ARE JOKING?! Lucky for you I'm on my phone right now and cannot be bothered to quote every single time you kept parroting 'neither'.
Quote: That was your own strawman of me.
Bull-fucking-shit. This is too rich.
Quote:So it took this long for you to admit I was right, basically. And you still haven't admitted I'm right explicitly, you've only done it implicitly, and you're probably going to continue to double down on why it's not a false dichotomy, according to you, despite just now implicitly agreeing that it is one.
Hopeless.
Quote:In reality, the only one embarrassing themselves here is you. Anyone who thinks I'm embarrassing myself is just one more person who can't grasp my logic.
Your brand of logic reeks of falsities. Not interested.
Quote:Here's my own argument from authority to counteract your bullshit about Plato, seen as you like your fallacies so much:
“Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.”
― Bertrand Russell
Cool.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~ Aristotle