On Moral Authorities

[Edwardo Piet]

I'm well aware, and I've shared my thoughts on that already. Though, that's not what Ham is talking about, purely due to the fact that he's unable to conceptualize the dilemma the right way.

Hilarious.

Oh well, I'd rather be underestimated than overestimated

Just because I won't budge my stubborn ass until you give a consistent answer about something and stop contradicting yourself doesn't mean I can't conceptualize something. I refuse to engage in what you want me to engage in if I'm dealing with someone who isn't even willing to give a consistent answer on whether a false dichotomy is one where the answer "neither" can be given. Once I know you're mature enough to stop doubling down on your self-contradicition, then we can talk about the dilemma. Either you know what a false dichotomy is or you don't. You tell me you know what one is and that you know the answer "neither" can be given and yet you continue to say it's not a false dichotomy. You're more interested in your pride and saving-face than debate, clearly. Like I said you'd make a better politician than a philosopher. I'll engage in what you want me to engage in when you admit that if the answer "neither" can be given it's a false dichotomy, and since the answer "neither" can be given, it's a false dichotomy. Rather than admit that I'm right about that you'd like to strawman me with all this bullshit pretending I'm saying the answer necessarily is neither. I never said there necessarily are no gods. I'm stubborn regarding your wrongness and correcting you because your self-contradiction is embarassing and I'm testing you to see if you're actually worthy of debate. Because until you can learn to debate someone without doubling down on your self-contradiction when you've been shown to be wrong, you're not worthy of debate. You've literally said you know that a false dichotomy is a dichotomy where "neither" could be the case, and you've also said you know that within the dilemma you speak of "neither" could be the case.... the fact you can't put 2 and 2 together and continue to say it's not a false dichotomy is so embarrassing. You'd rather pretend 2+2 isn't 4 than admit you're wrong about something.