RE: Is the self all that can be known to exist?
November 18, 2016 at 5:08 pm
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2016 at 5:09 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
(November 18, 2016 at 4:16 pm)Excited Penguin Wrote: I do experience other things. And they do certainly exist. The question is not whether they exist or not. The question is how they exist. Do they exist as concepts in my own mind, or do they exist independently of me? I think the latter is a necessarily illogic way of putting it.Okay, so we've determined that other things exist (?)....this is a problem though, if you insist on calling them other things but also that they are merely things in your mind. If that were true, they aren't other things at all. Just more of yourself, more of the same thing. If they are things, if things even exist.
Why do you think it's necessarily illogical to think that things exist independantly of you, and have you ever considered that the choice between "in my own mind" -or- "independently of me" is one you needn't make? A false dilemma? They could be both, no? Very roughly, that's what people who take these things to be referent think.
Quote:In a sense, we could argue, we don't know that our brains exist either. There I would agree with you. Every atom we experience, we can never tell for sure whether it exists or not. We can only ever tell that -something- exists. Call it whatever you like. Call it a process rather than an object. Not the self, but awareness. That is what is meant by the self, anyway, but I'm trying to walk you through it here.What atoms, what brains? What objects....what somethings? In any case, we're taking about awareness, rather than self?
Quote:Awareness is real. Wouldn't you say? Even if you are a -zombie- with no conscience, R, you have to aknowledge awareness. If you don't, then we delve into utter nonsense. How are you typing right now if you're not aware? How do you respond to me if you're not there? Or is it that none of us is aware? What does it mean to be aware then, why do we have this idea? What does the concept describe? Does it describe it?Us? We? Typing? On what...keyboards? You're just talking to yourself, within yourself, by yourself. Aware of what, yourself?
Quote:I can't quantify it, Rhythm. But it is there. You have to aknowledge that. Language can only go so far. I can't show you what is hiding behind the symbol of language. I can only refer to it and hope you're going to play this language game with me in the interest of ... it. Once again.Rhythm? There? I;m sorry, what could you possibly be referring to? This is just you, in you, talking to you.
Quote:It comes up again and again.How can I be, there is no me, only you?
Are you with me?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
