Utter crap. You can't use the tired old argument of no proof means possible proof of existance, which ever way you wing it, ridiculous examples following:
Celestial teapot.
Good old Flying Spaghetti Monster.
"Insert stupid fucking boring cyclic waste of time argument symbolism here"
Cmon, humour me, you seriously expect me to believe you or I are going to consider the existance of the teapot?
Celestial teapot.
Good old Flying Spaghetti Monster.
"Insert stupid fucking boring cyclic waste of time argument symbolism here"
Cmon, humour me, you seriously expect me to believe you or I are going to consider the existance of the teapot?