RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 21, 2016 at 7:44 pm
(This post was last modified: November 21, 2016 at 7:57 pm by Cyberman.)
Even assuming the OP isn't a troll, this thread just exposes the binary thinking endemic to the fundie mindset. Even if evolution was completely demolished tomorrow, it would still in no way mean that religion wins by default; no matter how warm and fluffy it makes you feel. The religionist would still have all their work in front of them.
The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.
The problem, as I said elsewhere, is that the creationist dogma mill has no system for trapping and correcting errors; meaning that a lie once told gets bounced around and amplified, becoming one of Richard Dawkins' Unsinkable Rubber Ducks (aka PRATT arguments). And make no mistake, Joker, these people have a vested interest in lying to you. Stop being so gullible, for your own sake.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
