RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 25, 2016 at 12:49 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2016 at 12:54 pm by The Joker.)
(November 25, 2016 at 12:39 pm)LastPoet Wrote:(November 25, 2016 at 12:31 pm)The Joker Wrote: No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?
You notice that Stimbo's username is in red right? We have rules.
Yes, you have rules and I am not in opposition to it, but what I am saying is that, if atheism is true, then in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest? Because in atheism there is no objective morality but morality is subjective. So why is lying the object of morality?
There most be a moral giver, that moral giver is God.
