RE: Theist ➤ Why ☠ Evolution is not Scientific ✔
November 25, 2016 at 6:39 pm
(This post was last modified: November 25, 2016 at 6:39 pm by Cyberman.)
(November 25, 2016 at 12:31 pm)The Joker Wrote:(November 25, 2016 at 12:20 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You are still passing off the work of other people as your own. Paint it up however makes you feel better, but it is still a dishonest action. If you don't feel shame about it, then you are an immoral and bad person. I am so embarrassed for you right now.
(November 25, 2016 at 12:22 pm)Stimbo Wrote: If I took a video by someone else and made you believe it was my work, would that be right?
No It wouldn't, but in atheism there is no real right and wrong so according to atheism it doesn't matter, Friend. But anyway, Why is dishonesty the object of morality? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then how are your moral values not just based on your subjective opinions? If you do not have an objective standard of morality by which you can determine what is right or wrong, then what gives you the right to make moral judgments upon me that I am dishonest?
I don't care a wet fart about any of this herring shit. There is no "according to atheism", but even that's not relevant and I'm not going to bother chasing you on that. So quit trying.
Forget about "atheist" and "xtian" for two seconds. Is theft of another person's work right or wrong?
Put it this way. I know someone with an eight-year-old boy; even he knows the eifference between right and wrong. I don't believe for a nanosecond that you're as idiotic as you want to pretend.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
