Where do emotions such as Love from

[Ace Otana]

Would you be dead without eyes for sight? Isn't eyes tools like the other senses that assist?

Eyes don't keep your brain functioning. They merely send signals to it. You can't compare a body's sense to the brains primary functions.

Tell me what made a chemical reaction exist then?

Our brain produces them. It's part of how animals function. Our brain functions on biomass (the brain itself), electricity that passes through it and chemicals. To be without either one of those would incur death.

What motivation brought forth the desire of life to experience itself then?

Nothing. Single celled lifeforms evolve to become more complex lifeforms. Our evolutionary purpose is to survive and pass on genes. Didn't like that answer did you?

What is so absurd about it?

You'll see.

It is obvious that everything here is relative.

No it isn't. Only to you.

It is obvious that you need the relative for experience to be experienced. Is this absurd?

Yes that's absurd.

It is obvious that the relative exists for something to be experienced.

No it's not obvious. You detect things based on what your senses tell you. Got nothing to do with opposites of anything.

It is obvious that life practices experiencing.

Nope, life practices evolution and the co-existence of other matter and energy.

It is obvious that this universe and this realm exists for anything that can experience to experience because it can and does so.

Nope. The universe exists by natural events. Got nothing to do with purpose.

Are these lies, baseless assumptions and absurdity?

Pretty much, yes.

Are you scared to see an evident law in your plain view?

Are you scared of a reality where there is no greater purpose to anything?

I don't know why this would upset you and behave unkind.

I think it's you who's upset.

What im sharing with you will be very difficult to disprove.

You haven't proven anything yet, there's nothing to disprove.

It was not meant for us to experience?

Nothing was ever 'meant' for us. We are just a collection of chemicals and atoms co-existing with other chemicals and atoms.
What? You starting to feel meaningless?

Us meaning we humans or all life that can experience?

All life.

Hmm. You are saying that life which can experience was not meant to experience?

There is no 'meant' in anything. We exist through natural events, not purpose.

So the universe exists in relative form which makes experience possible was not meant for anything that can experience simply experience?

Prove relative makes experience possible.

You call me delusional with this?

Damn right.

I challenge you to disprove that the relative exists then.
Pattern or not, it is a law that exists to make experience possible.

You see what I've bolded in your quote? That is a claim, a claim you've just made. The burden of proof is on you. I'm not claiming anything. I have so far only rejected your beliefs. I'm still waiting for you to back your claims up.

Meaning, believing something that is evident does not exist.

I didn't claim that it doesn't exist, I simply rejected the idea. Difference.

There is no way one could disprove the relative to have experience.

It hasn't even been proven yet. You've only asserted it, not proved it.

I am saying it is evident that there is a law which makes experience possible.

Prove it.

You need relative form.

Back that up.

Where is life? There is (or there should be) life in abundance throughout the universe.

I also think life is in abundance, just unknown of their location.

What is it doing there? Experiencing itself.

Existing, co-existing, evolving.

What makes this possible? The relative makes this possible.

Prove it.

Then why does this realm exist? For experience to be possible.

Back that up please.

---
Well that was fun.