RE: meaningless sex, or loving affection?
December 8, 2016 at 12:35 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2016 at 1:09 pm by Neo-Scholastic.)
(December 8, 2016 at 10:41 am)Luckie Wrote: ...why specify waist down? Is neck down paralysis off the table for you?
My vow, to death do us part, extends to cover even a persistent vegetative state in which neither sex nor reciprocal affection would be possible. Whether I would be able to endure that tragedy while honoring that vow is another issue. I can only hope that the Lord would grant me that strength.
(December 8, 2016 at 10:41 am)Luckie Wrote: How bout if you were paralyzed waist down? ...would you set her free *if she was unhappy.
What makes you assume that people cannot be happy just because sensual pleasure is difficult or impossible? As a general statement, I find it very sad that Western cultures have become so obsessed with sex. Your question, as honest as it may be, seems emblematic of how corrupt and selfish society has become. We have lost the wisdom of prior ages that understood carnal pleasures pale in comparison to the blessings of virtue.
While we both hope our physical intimacy will continue indefinitely, our profound conjugal love goes far beyond sensual pleasures. In the end, I find greater joy in selfless service and tender kindnesses to her. We have discussed all the implications of "till death do us part" and we both agree on what that means. If the only act of physical intimacy that remains for us is to hold hands then that will more than suffice.