RE: meaningless sex, or loving affection?
December 8, 2016 at 12:46 pm
(This post was last modified: December 8, 2016 at 12:47 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(December 8, 2016 at 12:42 pm)Shell B Wrote: No question about it, non-sexual affection. Tibs and I are super cuddly, huggy, etc. Not having the sexual part would utterly suck, but I honestly don't think that man could give up hugs. He is the hugginest person on the planet. Then again, this poll says I have to choose between meaningless sex or loving affection. I don't have meaningless sex, so that's easy to give up. I mean, there really is no choice. If I picked meaningless sex with a stranger, I would lose sex and affection with my husband. That's a total loss.
This is my answer as well. I'm stealing it.
EDIT TO ADD: Except not in reference to Tibs, obviously lol.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
