RE: A kid on my childhood street and Trump
December 18, 2016 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: December 18, 2016 at 12:19 pm by scoobysnack.)
(December 18, 2016 at 12:58 am)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:The infrastructure will be rebuilt making jobs for inner city people getting them off of being dependent of welfare and finally free to be independent to seek self determination. The corporate tax rate will be lowered so they don't seek out countries which offer that, and actually create jobs here instead of China which has low rates and don't give a fuck about pollution.
What the fuck are you yammering on about? In case you haven't gotten out of momma's basement in the last 60 years we don't send gangs of men out with picks and shovels to do infrastructure projects anymore. It takes heavy equipment and you listen to the Orange Turd and suddenly think you are going to put this in the hands of people who have no clue how to do it?
And the GAO estimates that 70% of US corporations pay no taxes NOW so lowering the tax rate is not much of an incentive.
Step away from Breitbart, get your head out of your ass, and wake the fuck up, Scoobs.
lol, of course it uses heavy equipment which requires skilled labor and resources. Those jobs rebuilding the infrastructure lead to more wealth in the hands of the people who work them and they will spend locally in businesses which will then create more jobs and start to reverse the income inequality. It takes entrepreneurs who take on risk and loans to create jobs for labor to benefit from.
The reason manufacturing jobs move outside of the country is due to lower taxes in those countries which reduce labor costs which offset the costs of the supply chain and logistics to bring them back for consumers here to buy. If the tax rate is lowered here, it would incentivize companies to produce goods in the US and employ Americans and save the cost to ship the goods back to the US for consumers. Plus with the brand of make American great again, it will be popular again to buy American made products. The progressive left which is marxist really always focuses on labor and not the reasons management create jobs. It's a win win for everyone! Just wait and see what prosperity looks like.
I've noticed the progressives have a victim mindset, and it explains a lot. Ever read the 7 habits of highly effective people?
(December 18, 2016 at 12:33 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(December 17, 2016 at 11:44 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Remember what they called it before climate change? Global warming. And before that it was global cooling. Before that it was over population. [...]
Horsesh*t. You're a moron, who doesn't understand the subject and you're simply regurgitating propaganda created by people, who make money from fossil fuels. For them - every day, that regulations on carbon emissions are postponed, is worth millions, if not billions of dollars. And you're the kind of dipsh*t, who will accept a comforting lie, over harsh reality, because at the end of the day - you don't give a sh*t what kind of world your children will have to live in. Hey, Jezzles is going to come whisk you all away, to Neverland, any minute now, isn't he? No need to worry about this sh*thole planet, then...
I'll bet you don't believe cigarettes cause cancer either, right? Because for over half a century tobacco companies used the same tactics fuel companies are using now, pretending that there was still a debate over it, when there wasn't, so that addicts could lie to themselves and keep buying their sh*t.
There was never human-caused "global cooling", that 99% of scientists agreed on, like they do on climate change. It was a fantasy, that people used to like to read about, so newspapers wrote about it for a while - just like they did with, say, Satanic cults in the 80's, that were never a thing. You're confusing scientific consensus, with popular opinions of uneducated morons, like yourself.
The cooling of the atmosphere, due to clouds of heavy particles emitted by industrial chimneys, that would block out light, thus lowering temperatures underneath - that was something scientists knew about back in the 70's, just like they knew about the possibility of global warming due to greenhouse gasses. But climate science was much less developed 50 years ago (A-DUUUUUUH!), most of the relevant data was still to be collected, so it wasn't clear which of the ecological problems caused by growing industrial pollution were going to be the most damaging half a century later. And over those 50 years we solved some of the problems, like improved filters on industrial chimneys, therefore making "global cooling" a thing of the past.
The same industrial emissions would also cause acid rains - but I'll bet you don't believe in those either, because you don't hear about them anymore, huh? And you probably think polio is a myth, because vaccines work so well...
Science and technology make progress and solve problems - that doesn't mean we won't have new problems to overcome. And stupid people like you only stand in the way, because you only care about your own convenience.
You're an imbecile and a dangerous one. I hope your children and your grand-children will adequately thank you one day. I hope they put you in a home, right on the coast somewhere. In a basement...
I'm surprised you didn't bring up bigfoot hahaha! Try not to go into a hysterical conniption fit when someone questions your dogma. I have a hurt feelings report for you to fill out and a nice box of tissues for your tears if you felt triggered lol. And then you go off on some tangent rant to top it off. Very comical!
I'm all for clean energy, but realize energy is what creates the life style we have in the modern world. Fossil fuels led to the industrial revolution and modern world and I know you and everyone in the world are enjoying the benefits even if you don't support them. Our infrastructure is built around fossil fuels that if dismantled would be devastating loss of economic freedom and life. Yes I actually do believe pollution does affect climate negatively, and we should work for ways to reduce it.
That being said, the climate alarmists have been consistently wrong on their models of doom and gloom. When you research the history of it you start to understand it's a means to an end. The end is technocracy where unelected officials make decisions based on the science they believe at the time to affect the lives of the public. This is why the left has everything inverted. Before they fought for the little people, and now they are united with the establishment thinking they are on the winning team, when they are actually the biggest losers in the greatest swindle in history. Deceived useful idiots.
The math is wrong, simply put, which is why the models fail to deliver the results they should