RE: meaningless sex, or loving affection?
December 20, 2016 at 9:31 am
(This post was last modified: December 20, 2016 at 9:35 am by Mystical.)
Interesting, i think you actually got a legitimate poll of peoples true opinions! Not counting the other category, it looks like meaningful non sexual relations taie precident.
Take that, someone! *punches air
Good poll C_L
Hey thats not fair to blanket categorize an enture gender without having tried alternatives as well! Also why did I upvote your post? Oh yeah. I have friends who have been female. To be fair though the friends who were male weren't much better to their partners, either. I just think ever u one fucks everyone else up on purpose or not, it just happens. I can only hope to be as jaded and faded as you once i reach your sex sign-age.
Take that, someone! *punches air
Good poll C_L
(December 9, 2016 at 1:09 am)Atheist_BG Wrote:(December 8, 2016 at 9:52 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: A spin off from Rob's poll which I found very interesting but not quite specific enough.
Poll Question: If you could only choose to keep one, which would it be? Meaningless, affectionless sex with a person/persons you don't care about, or non sexual, genuine affection (kissing, hugs, cuddling, etc) with someone you love and who loves you?
If you had asked me that question 10 years ago, I'd choose the second option. But nowadays, thanks to your gender, I choose the first one without hesitation.
Hey thats not fair to blanket categorize an enture gender without having tried alternatives as well! Also why did I upvote your post? Oh yeah. I have friends who have been female. To be fair though the friends who were male weren't much better to their partners, either. I just think ever u one fucks everyone else up on purpose or not, it just happens. I can only hope to be as jaded and faded as you once i reach your sex sign-age.
If I were to create self aware beings knowing fully what they would do in their lifetimes, I sure wouldn't create a HELL for the majority of them to live in infinitely! That's not Love, that's sadistic. Therefore a truly loving god does not exist!
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
![[Image: tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif]](https://66.media.tumblr.com/5fb74c6d16622fb3dbb358509c9aec03/tumblr_n1j4lmACk61qchtw3o1_500.gif)
Quote:The sin is against an infinite being (God) unforgiven infinitely, therefore the punishment is infinite.
Dead wrong. The actions of a finite being measured against an infinite one are infinitesimal and therefore merit infinitesimal punishment.
Quote:Some people deserve hell.
I say again: No exceptions. Punishment should be equal to the crime, not in excess of it. As soon as the punishment is greater than the crime, the punisher is in the wrong.
