A challenge!

[Asmodee]

It's actually because I don't have time to reply to a bunch of people at the same time. So I would rather limit it to one on one.

Doesn't really matter if you are responding to one, or many, your arguments are no less flawed.

I am sure that anyone here that agrees to debate you, will easily be able to detect all the fallacies in your arguments.

Unless you are going to offer anything new, why waste your and our time?

I came to the conclusion long ago that this is impossible.  So many times I gave the arguer the benefit of doubt and listened only to find it was the same old shit arguments.  I can tell already that the OP is going to offer up some logical arguments instead of actual evidence.  I would assume that the argument for step 2 will likely be some variant of the Kalam cosmological argument.  In fact, I seem to remember seeing a similar argument a few months ago, except step 3 concluded it was some form of Christianity which was the "one true faith".