I find in telling people already know there are no proofs for God before proofs are presented. *smiles*
There were valid arguments presented before, what was disputed was not the validity of the argument, but if all the premises were sound. So I have new angles and arguments to prove all the premises are sound.
Why do you in haste conclude there is no evidence or proof?
There were valid arguments presented before, what was disputed was not the validity of the argument, but if all the premises were sound. So I have new angles and arguments to prove all the premises are sound.
Why do you in haste conclude there is no evidence or proof?