A challenge!

[Asmodee]

I find in telling people already know there are no proofs for God before proofs are presented. *smiles*

There were valid arguments presented before, what was disputed was not the validity of the argument, but if all the premises were sound. So I have new angles and arguments to prove all the premises are sound.

Why do you in haste conclude there is no evidence or proof?

Even you don't claim to be offering "proofs".  What you have is an argument that you believe can "prove" some deity exists if you can just get the wording exactly right.  It's essentially a trick of language that you have.  Nothing more.  We know that there are no "proofs" because so many before you have come with philosophical tricks and nonsense pretending they're "proofs".  It's all logical "if/then" statements worded in such a way as to be just confusing and vague enough to make them difficult to respond to and, when someone does, you have plenty of wiggle room to narrow them down a little, just enough to exclude their argument.

And if a single premise isn't sound the argument is not valid, so disputing the validity of the premises is disputing the validity of the argument.