(January 4, 2017 at 1:48 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I find in telling people already know there are no proofs for God before proofs are presented. *smiles*
There is nothing new.
Collectively, we have heard all arguments ever presented.
Yours are not new. They are just different versions of the same old, same old...
Quote:There were valid arguments presented before, what was disputed was not the validity of the argument, but if all the premises were sound. So I have new angles and arguments to prove all the premises are sound.
No they weren't.
I can remember refuting the validity of your arguments. I was almost always ignored.
Quote:Why do you in haste conclude there is no evidence or proof?
Because we have heard it all.
I am always open to demonstrable evidence, reasoned argument and valid and sound logic to support the claim that a god or gods exist. But if all you have to offer are variations of long refuted arguments, save us all the time.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
