Pulse Wrote:How else can we continue to discuss atheism if we leave science out of it? Atheists constantly say there's no evidence for God, isn't that a scientific statement?
It's a statement that we're unaware of any evidence for God. You can easily refute the atheists who say that by demonstrating some actual evidence that really points to a deity being real. Better, for instance, than the evidence for Santa Clause being real. Give us a reason to consider the null hypothesis refuted.
Atheism is not believing any god or God is real. You could be an atheist in 5,000 BC; no science required. Just a disinclination to take people's word for it that their deity is real.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
