RE: What do you think of this argument for God?
March 4, 2017 at 4:53 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2017 at 4:59 am by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
TheAtheologian Wrote:Premise 4 says that every aspect of God is possible (exists in some possible world) since God by definition is the greatest possible being. By accepting premise 1 as a definition of God, all aspects of God are possible. Adding impossible aspects is inconsistent with premise 1.
According to your first premise
Quote:1. God is the greatest possible being.
(emphasis mine)
The greatest possible being by definition can posses only the greatest possible characteristics, impossible characteristics are unfortunately not one among the possible characteristics of the greatest possible being. Suppose a religion include impossible characteristics as one of the possible characteristics of the greatest possible being, ie, God, then it simply follows that God is the greatest impossible being since only an impossible being may posses impossible characteristics, ie, non-existent.