(March 4, 2017 at 5:12 am)TheAtheologian Wrote: That is the main problem with it, why assume this "greatest possible being" is necessary? If we do, then it is pushing the concept into existence, which can be done with nearly anything.
However, it does not ride on the idea that anything is possible, but bases itself on whatever is possible.
Then if you don't hold to the idea that "anything is possible" you will have to accept that the actual possibilities of reality may not include the "God" that this argument is trying to define away.