(March 15, 2017 at 11:34 pm)vorlon13 Wrote: Have they said what clause or proviso the first judge missed?
Not as such, no. As far as I can tell, the judge this time round said the ban amounted to a religious test - essentially, when you ban travelers from a country with a 99.6% Muslim population, it is effectively a ban on Muslims.
The legalese seems to boil down to, 'Nice try, Mr. Trump, but you're not fooling anyone.'
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax