RE: What do you think of this argument for God?
March 18, 2017 at 1:04 am
(This post was last modified: March 18, 2017 at 1:04 am by Mystic.)
(March 18, 2017 at 12:57 am)Jesster Wrote:(March 18, 2017 at 12:53 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Sorry I mean to say everything that exists is possible, but not necessary.
This is true. However, there's no reason to believe something is possible before finding any evidence for it.
(March 18, 2017 at 12:53 am)MysticKnight Wrote: But there has to be an existence that is necessary.
Things certainly exist. I don't know that it's necessary, though.
What does the existence of anything have to do with a necessary being?
I will explain more in the Mulla Sadra argument.
Existence defines existence. Existence is reason for existence.
Seems trivial, but this proves a lot.
It proves we are not existence but rather borrow life from existence. We depend on existence.
(March 18, 2017 at 12:57 am)Jesster Wrote:(March 18, 2017 at 12:53 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Sorry I mean to say everything that exists is possible, but not necessary.
This is true. However, there's no reason to believe something is possible before finding any evidence for it.
(March 18, 2017 at 12:53 am)MysticKnight Wrote: But there has to be an existence that is necessary.
Things certainly exist. I don't know that it's necessary, though.
What does the existence of anything have to do with a necessary being?
I will explain more in the Mulla Sadra argument.
Existence defines existence. Existence is reason for existence.
Seems trivial, but this proves a lot.
It proves we are not existence but rather borrow life from existence. We depend on existence.