RE: What do you think of this argument for God?
March 19, 2017 at 11:42 am
(This post was last modified: March 19, 2017 at 11:43 am by Mystic.)
To put a -1 * -1 = 1 make look like cheating but if you understand it, you know why it is true.
The same is true of this argument. It may look like cheating but in fact, it's because we deal with negative, we assume God is a possible being, but when you combine that with the definition he is the necessary being, then you know it doesn't matter where you start the assumption...you can start with assumption that non-existence brought existence to existence, and you would prove that wrong, and come to notion that existence is necessary and one and absolute.
All things pertain to existence and necessity with whatever assumption you start, you will get to God.
That is because God is the truth by which all truth is derived from, he is the foundation of reason, life, existence, morals, and insight, love, humor, tears, etc... The concept of possibility itself proves necessity.
The same is true of this argument. It may look like cheating but in fact, it's because we deal with negative, we assume God is a possible being, but when you combine that with the definition he is the necessary being, then you know it doesn't matter where you start the assumption...you can start with assumption that non-existence brought existence to existence, and you would prove that wrong, and come to notion that existence is necessary and one and absolute.
All things pertain to existence and necessity with whatever assumption you start, you will get to God.
That is because God is the truth by which all truth is derived from, he is the foundation of reason, life, existence, morals, and insight, love, humor, tears, etc... The concept of possibility itself proves necessity.
