What do you think of this argument for God?

[masterofpuppets]

You have merely presupposed God as the foundation for all truth, and then claim that because truth exists, God exists. However, we don't need a foundation for truth. Truth is that which corresponds to reality, nothing more, nothing less, no God needed. I am also curious as to why you claim that we should assume God is not only possible but also necessary. This is flawed because you have yet to demonstrate the veracity of all these claims, and hence they hold as much water as a spaghetti strainer.

There has to be a foundation of all truth, and it is the reality, not the combination of realities which all need their truth to have a foundation, and only God can be the foundation of all truth (this is not argument, I am simply stating this as they are), and so God is the reality.

I think I just explained to you that your presupposition is utterly unsupported. A hundred restatements of the same argument doesn't make it any more valid.

Please demonstrate that (a) there has to be a foundation of all truth, other than reality itself, (b) upon demonstrating (a), that this foundation can only be God.