To explain why we can define God to affirm his existence!

[Angrboda]

Regardless of what 'defined by perception' means, we are a product of our brains, that makes the 'who' of what we are a subjective reality,

. . . . . .

Now this can be said to be appeal to consequence, but it's not.

Yes it is.

It's because we know we have true worth inherently. We know it as children and we know it now.

Got any evidence besides your bare assertion here?

We know we are to be loved and valued, and that we have potential. We know that potential is not simply what we tell ourselves we can become or what we are.

There is higher calling in all this but you want to call all foundations of knowledges ourselves, which speaks of not only of love and appreciation of ourselves, but of others, to be without basis.

Love and value are not invalidated by subjectivity. You're essentially arguing that these phenomenon need to be transcendent to be real, and that they can only be transcendent if there is an eternal standard in God. This is an argument from ignorance; you can't see how these phenomenon can be transcendent without God, therefore God. Well that's a fallacious argument. And it's easily dismissed on that basis.

The truth is what is without basis is disbelief in God. It doesn't make sense to disbelieve in God in any time with any human. He is linked to reality and we cannot separate from his vision.

Nonsense.