RE: The void
April 20, 2017 at 10:50 am
(This post was last modified: April 20, 2017 at 10:50 am by WinterHold.)
Alex K
It explains the phenomena, not the believe of the author of the segment.
I understand that to every action there is a cause; nothing starts on its own. That's why I concluded the existence of God from the passage.
Alex K
You're suggesting that nothing is really empty; but our instruments are too limited to find out yet?
Like dark matter and dark energy; with more advancements in the measuring ways we will find out what fills that void?
Gawdzilla Sama
I'm defining "must" based on the rules I know.
Mister Agenda
No; the personal God is not what I mean; the Creator is all we are left with if we were to take science seriously, the concept has long been known under the term "base case" in mathematical functions.
Gawdzilla Sama
"Validation" is a good word..
Simon Moon
I have other dreams; believe it or not God answers the prayers.
Einstein wasn't an atheist. Newton was a theist. So many physicists believe in an order; a certain law the universe has, it didn't need to be this organized, things could've been more messy.
Quote:@Atlas
I don't know whether you understand the passage on Baryoacoustic oscillations you quoted, but it doesn't say anything about divine creation of cosmic voids, more like the exact opposite. It more or less explains how these voids arise simply because stuff clumps together from gravitation. Also, ir tells you that these voids are not magically empty places but have a lower particle density than the rest.
It explains the phenomena, not the believe of the author of the segment.
I understand that to every action there is a cause; nothing starts on its own. That's why I concluded the existence of God from the passage.
Alex K
You're suggesting that nothing is really empty; but our instruments are too limited to find out yet?
Like dark matter and dark energy; with more advancements in the measuring ways we will find out what fills that void?
Gawdzilla Sama
I'm defining "must" based on the rules I know.
Mister Agenda
No; the personal God is not what I mean; the Creator is all we are left with if we were to take science seriously, the concept has long been known under the term "base case" in mathematical functions.
Gawdzilla Sama
"Validation" is a good word..
Simon Moon
I have other dreams; believe it or not God answers the prayers.
Einstein wasn't an atheist. Newton was a theist. So many physicists believe in an order; a certain law the universe has, it didn't need to be this organized, things could've been more messy.
