(April 20, 2017 at 12:18 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(April 20, 2017 at 12:11 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: You consider your own moral code authoritative, yes? If so, how is this any different that having no moral code and acting entirely on whim?
Aren't the differences obvious and self stated even in that sentence?
One the one hand, a moral code exists....your moral code - so, obviously you have a (as in, at least one, lol?) moral code...not no moral code - as in..none. Less than one.
Continuing, a moral code exists which is informing a persons actions - so obviously you aren't acting entirely on a whim, you're acting on that moral code, that does exist, that you possess.
......?
Are some personal moral codes better than others?
