(April 20, 2017 at 5:01 pm)Brian37 Wrote:(April 20, 2017 at 3:27 pm)AtlasS33 Wrote: Brian37
Our mental limitations give "messy" a meaning; if we have more brain cells nothing would be messy, we exist with this brain though.
If things can be assembled together, then they're not messy.
The negative is the antonym of the positive. If both didn't exist, then the neutral would not exist also. That's like saying that T.V don't exist because pets can't understand what it is.
We understood the positive and negative through science, or in other words "we proved their existence", that's all.
No, we don't exist with our brains, we are our brains in motion.
Scientists prove the existence of those particles, and their methods were NEUTRAL and not pointing to any god or any club.
If our minds can draw a scenario, then it can be turned into a reality.
It's a special ability humans have; thinking and understanding are what differ us from beasts. We create, that's what we do. Draw the image in our mind then print it.
Physics are the study of the successful way to dream; and what are the limitations to our imagination.
Mister Agenda
Quote:You're making me sad for you, Atlas. Something existing in your brain/imagination in no way implies that the thing you're dreaming of exists or can exist in reality. A thousand times no. There are lots of things you can make with a 3D printer and an infinite number of imaginable things that can never be made real with a 3D printer or with anything else.
The limitations exist. But "infinity" was already discovered and added to the concepts of mathematics, and where infinity exists, any thought can exist. Even if it was God.
Alex K
Quote:The post with the wiki quote upthread illustrates what's wrong with Atlas' thinking. He quoted a piece of an article about astrophysics and cosmology to support his claim, but his understanding of what he was quoting was so incredibly shallow that he can't have done more than pick two words from it which he could spin a tale around about what he'd like the article to say. If he does the same with other "arguments"...
Shallow it quite understandable for me, it's wasn't my field whatsoever; but I love it.
But we have particles of hydrogen and helium, but they are ionised. So they behave differently than when they're a gas.
downbeatplumb
"Not" a theist.
and also "not" an atheist.
