Insulting Religion

[Rayaan]

So the sword wielding mob was nothing more than a theatrical prop?

http://www.historyworld.net/wrldhis/Plai...raphID=ebf

They did invade those countries but they did not force people to convert to Islam. For hundreds of years, the majority of the inhabitants of those countries remained at their original religion.

So, the purpose of the invasion was not to spread Islam, but it was to spread the Islamic way of governance. This is very similar as the western world wanting to spread Democracy including if it requires war or sanctions and so on. The Muslims also offered pacts to some countries rather than changing their system (although most countries chose fighting). Expansion is not required by Islam. It is, however, allowed only if the ruler of the Muslim state decides to do so.

Also, there were many examples of Christians, Jews, and other communities flourishing under Islamic rule without being forced to live as Muslims. Muhammad granted autonomy to Christians and Jews as long as they sign a pact of non-aggression and pay taxes - and in return - they get their autonomy and a guarantee for safety and security for their lives, money, and honor. (For more info on this topic, see Jews of Islam, by Bernard Lews).

See here for a more thorough treatment: http://aristophrenium.com/fisher/surah-9...the-sword/

I'll take a look at it.

But, here's another thorough-er-er-er treatment: http://www.load-islam.com/artical_det.ph...onceptions