(May 2, 2017 at 8:36 pm)Nanny Wrote:(May 2, 2017 at 12:22 pm)Brian37 Wrote: It's always the drunk driver who does it over and over, then crashes only to realize it only takes one time.
The gun owners who DONT brag about how good they are with guns are the ones I think take ownership seriously and I would trust far more owning one. The ones who talk like Dirty Harry, are far more likely to get stupid while owning one.
Keep thinking you are hot shit buddy, I hope your false sense of security doesn't get you needlessly injured or killed.
You do understand that cops and military are trained in stress use of a firearm and most civilians are not trained in stress use of a firearm. Hate to burst your bubble buddy, you are STILL far more likely to injure yourself or someone you know while handling a firearm than you would be successfully defending yourself from a stranger aiming a firearm at you.
There is alot more to defending yourself successfully with a firearm than your good intent. Cops and military have to constantly train for use of a firearm under stress. It isn't a simple as target shooting.
How many hours a week do you train for stress use of a firearm? Target shooting is not the same thing.
OH FUCK OFF,
This is just more paranoid bullshit on your part. NEVER in anyone of my posts here have I ever said "get rid of all firearms". Now PUT UP OR SHUT THE FUCK UP! QUOTE ME WHERE I SAID "GET RID OF ALL GUNS"..... You wont find that I have never advocated a ban on all guns. SO FUCKING KNOCK IT OFF.
Saying we don't need to make as many, and saying we need a better vetting process is NOT a call for an all out ban.
You sound just as fucking paranoid as the car companies in the 1970s when Nadar said cars have a problem.
Nobody is trying to dictate to you moron! If anything 1 profit lobby is holding our entire nation hostage. MOST Americans INCLUDING MOST GUN OWNERS want a universal background check.
Liberals own guns too.
You are the one who thinks you know whats best for say, the victims of Newtown or Pulse "sucks to be you". So anyone objecting to our gun laws doesn't have a right to vote?
You are not making one fucking pragmatic argument moron. Don't even pretend you are.
I am not going to repeat this again.
I DON'T WANT ALL FIREARMS BANNED............. But I do have the right to vote, don't like it, TOUGH SHIT.
If we didn't have a gun injury/death problem in America nobody would be bitching. But in a free society voting occurs and gun makers and the NRA don't have the right to dictate to everyone. Now, you can work with us, we'd love that, but no, we've done the "do nothing, sell more" crap, and the last time the right cared about gun injury was when Reagan got shot, since then the right have gone insane and been hijacked by nuts. If the NRA was still the safety non profit org it started out as, I would have no problem with it. But is is nothing more than a heat shield for gun factories. Much like big tobacco created a "smokers rights" lobby in an attempt to avoid being called out for their bad marketing.
IF YOU WANT A GUN nobody is stopping you IDIOT. All the sane want is better laws so that people DONT have the ability to get guns if they are mentally ill, domestic abusers, or anti government or religious terrorists. Maybe you find things like VA tech or Roof acceptable, "just because", but I don't.
My voting is my right and my voting DOES NOT mean I am dictating to you. GROW THE FUCK UP.
Wow. Must've struck a nerve.
You are wildly polemic with limited vocabulary. Happy trolling to you.
Yea, so Roof was my imagination? Newtown was my imagination? Pulse was my imagination? Va Tech was my imagination? Columbine was my imagination?
Yea glad a "bullshit" bothers you more than gun violence.
I think you should get your priorities in order.