Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

[Mister Agenda]

Tom Wright is a fine scholar and a firm believer in the resurrection. So why do you cite him since you obviously disagree with him on the central issue? It's kind of like complaining that you aren't being hung with a new rope.

I am impressed. The fallacy of 'how dare you cite someone on something they are qualified to have an educated opinion on when you don't agree with every position they hold' seems a little long, but it may be the most concise way to describe what's been accomplished here. It seems like a round-the-block to get to a tu quoque combined with a reverse appeal to authority and a backwards ad hom. If I were one of the judges, I'd give it a ten.