Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: January 30, 2025, 8:27 am

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

Cyberman

Beta cuck male

Religious Views: Frisbeetarian

Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation: 155

#42

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

May 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

(May 4, 2017 at 9:12 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:
(May 4, 2017 at 7:58 am)Gawdzilla Sama Wrote: I've never had fatih.

That's too bad. I sincerely hope that soon you receive the internal testimony of the Holy Spirit.

That's rather like wishing a broken leg on someone because you have one.

At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 12:11 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 1, 2017 at 12:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 1, 2017 at 12:29 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 12:30 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 1, 2017 at 2:01 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 1, 2017 at 2:19 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 2:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 2:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 2:36 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Ben Davis - May 11, 2017 at 8:11 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Silver - May 1, 2017 at 2:43 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 1, 2017 at 3:04 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 3:57 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 1, 2017 at 7:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 9:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 2, 2017 at 8:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 1, 2017 at 8:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 2, 2017 at 8:57 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gawdzilla Sama - May 2, 2017 at 9:49 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 3, 2017 at 7:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 4, 2017 at 9:12 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 4, 2017 at 3:10 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2017 at 9:51 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 5, 2017 at 10:06 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 5, 2017 at 11:44 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 7, 2017 at 3:22 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 5, 2017 at 9:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 3, 2017 at 8:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 3, 2017 at 8:59 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 3, 2017 at 1:25 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 10, 2017 at 7:43 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 1, 2017 at 3:28 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 4:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 9:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 2, 2017 at 1:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by brewer - May 2, 2017 at 7:28 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gemini - May 7, 2017 at 6:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 2, 2017 at 7:38 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 11:35 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 2, 2017 at 10:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 2, 2017 at 10:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 3, 2017 at 12:08 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 3, 2017 at 6:14 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 3, 2017 at 8:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gawdzilla Sama - May 4, 2017 at 7:58 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 12:31 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 7, 2017 at 5:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 7, 2017 at 11:41 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 7, 2017 at 2:53 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 8, 2017 at 5:30 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 8:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 8, 2017 at 2:24 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 9, 2017 at 10:22 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 10:35 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 9, 2017 at 11:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 12:18 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 12:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 1:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 2:11 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 2:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 9, 2017 at 2:45 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:06 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:30 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:34 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 4:44 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:46 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:35 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 4:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 8:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 10, 2017 at 4:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 10, 2017 at 6:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 5:28 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 11, 2017 at 10:39 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Silver - May 11, 2017 at 10:42 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 11, 2017 at 12:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 11, 2017 at 1:01 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 9, 2017 at 5:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 5:27 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 10, 2017 at 10:42 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Minimalist - May 7, 2017 at 3:39 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 8, 2017 at 9:14 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 9:47 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 3:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 8, 2017 at 8:19 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 9:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 8, 2017 at 11:34 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 11:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 9, 2017 at 10:23 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 10:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 10, 2017 at 3:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 9:21 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 10, 2017 at 6:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 8:47 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 10, 2017 at 4:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 5:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 10:31 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 2:10 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 2:44 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 10, 2017 at 4:58 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 5:08 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 6:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 8:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Silver - May 10, 2017 at 8:49 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 10, 2017 at 8:51 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Silver - May 10, 2017 at 8:53 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 10, 2017 at 9:00 pm

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 9:29 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Silver - May 10, 2017 at 9:30 pm

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 9:37 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 9:57 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 10:49 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 11, 2017 at 6:16 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 4:46 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 11, 2017 at 3:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 11, 2017 at 8:26 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 7:48 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 8:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by comet - May 13, 2017 at 9:00 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right?	Hellomate1234	28	1898	November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
	Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not?	Nishant Xavier	91	7761	August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Why do psychologists need religion?	Interaktive	17	2240	May 16, 2021 at 11:47 am Last Post: Jehanne
	Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS	Rinni92	13	3673	August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm Last Post: Sal
	Why is Jesus Circumcised and not the rest of the christians ?	Megabullshit	23	6290	February 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
	Not religious doesn't necessarily mean atheist	John V	99	22101	November 8, 2017 at 9:28 pm Last Post: Martian Mermaid
	Why atheism is important, and why religion is dangerous	causal code	20	9542	October 17, 2017 at 4:42 pm Last Post: pocaracas
	Do you think Science and Religion can co-exist in a society?	ErGingerbreadMandude	137	43900	June 10, 2017 at 3:21 pm Last Post: comet
	Why Science and religious faith are in conflict.	Jehanne	28	8694	May 1, 2017 at 6:24 pm Last Post: vorlon13
	Let us think why humanity developed several religions but only one science?	Nishant	10	3414	January 4, 2017 at 1:42 pm Last Post: Minimalist

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me