RE: Can there be an object with a relationship?
May 6, 2017 at 4:47 am
(This post was last modified: May 6, 2017 at 5:02 am by WinterHold.)
(May 1, 2017 at 6:45 pm)TheMuslim Wrote: Usually when we talk about relations and links, it involves three things: two objects that are linked, and the link between them. However, is there anything inherently implausible or contradictory about there being nothing in a universe except for an object and a link to it? In other words, can there be just a link and an object to which the link is attached?
Links and relations are, by definition, connections between two things. But why can't one of those two things be the link or relation itself?
There was once a Shiite Muslim who tried to be deep. The product was a blender of nonsense connected to a bridge.
A link connected to an object, and just that, is called "Unfinished business". Like Ali's campaign against Muaweya.
An object can exist without "links". Ever heard about the singularity that gave birth to the big bang?
The second link is the future. I don't think you know what the future would be.
Are you Mystic Knight? or a friend of his?
I remember your old topics; they're a single entity attached to a single bridge:
https://atheistforums.org/thread-42051.html
WTF man? Heroine; right?
Oh I forgot. The Shiite Missionary bombardment