The only rational problem with Atheism

[theVOID]

Take notice guys. This is how to properly break down a post....with a sense of humor. Good job there buddy.

Anyway, to help your limited mind grasp this concept, think of space like the ocean. Do you know why there is an island of trash in the pacific. It is because all objects gravitate toward on another. The only thing that can prevent objects colliding is motion. Right now the expansion is fast, so the objects are still powered by some thing stronger than gravity...momentum.

And all the organic material hasn't 'gravitated' towards one point why? Oh, because unlike the rubbish it is neither buoyant, as susceptible to tidal influences or easily tangled. The formation and location of this mass of rubbish is much better explained by tidal forces.

And one other thing you have completely failed to account for; The momentum of objects in flight decreases over time and distance, what we would expect to see as the result of an explosion is a deceleration of the expansion of the universe, what we actually see is the complete opposite, the expansion is accelerating despite distance and time - In order to increase the momentum of objects in motion we need to add more energy, like if the you threw a Frisbee along the path of a strong wind or "stepping on the gas" when increasing the acceleration of a car.

Now, if the big bang was in fact some sort of bursting of matter out into space, then that matter will speed up and then slow down. As it slows down, it will start to glob together.

No, it will begin travelling at it's maximum velocity and then slow down over time, it won't speed up to a point and then slow down and reverse.

If the universe is expanding at an infinitely faster rate, and is never going to slow down, then there was no big bang. Either way I am right.

You're so far from right that it would probably be easier to send you to Physics 101 than explain it to you here.

Let me ask you this; If you are so confident in your understand these aspects of cosmology why don't you express your claims in mathematical terms? After all, any physicist worth two shits knows that in order to make sure your conclusions are legitimate you must express the idea mathematically - It is impossible to be imprecise in math, unlike the vague garbage you have spewed forth.