RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!
May 9, 2017 at 12:55 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2017 at 12:57 pm by Angrboda.)
(May 9, 2017 at 10:35 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(May 9, 2017 at 10:22 am)Little Rik Wrote: Even animals and plants know that feelings are evidence.
Indeed. The revulsion people feel towards the Holocaust is evidence that there are moral facts.
The revulsion people feel towards the holocaust is evidence that there are moral opinions, not that there are moral facts. This is weak, Chad. The feelings are evidence that people have feelings. Nothing more. Perhaps you'd like to explain how you torture moral facts out of this? The ubiquity of an opinion is not evidence that it has an objective grounding. That's simply a non sequitur.