Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!

Current time: August 13, 2026, 5:10 pm

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Thread Modes

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

LadyForCamus Offline

Retired Staff

Religious Views: Atheist

Posts: 9916
Threads: 53
Joined: November 27, 2015
Reputation: 92

#106

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3!

May 10, 2017 at 9:29 pm (This post was last modified: May 10, 2017 at 9:38 pm by LadyForCamus.)

(May 9, 2017 at 1:20 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: You seem to have a penchant for ignoring intentionality. Feelings are not just feelings - they are feelings about something. Feeling don't just arise for no reason in response to nothing.

Clearly you've never been pregnant. [emoji849] What an ignorant comment; even for you, Wooters.

Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”

Wiser words were never spoken.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 12:11 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 1, 2017 at 12:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 1, 2017 at 12:29 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 12:30 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 1, 2017 at 2:01 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 1, 2017 at 2:19 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 2:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 2:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 2:36 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Ben Davis - May 11, 2017 at 8:11 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Paraselene - May 1, 2017 at 2:43 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 1, 2017 at 3:04 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 3:57 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 1, 2017 at 7:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 1, 2017 at 9:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 2, 2017 at 8:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 1, 2017 at 8:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 2, 2017 at 8:57 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gawdzilla Sama - May 2, 2017 at 9:49 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 3, 2017 at 7:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 4, 2017 at 9:12 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 4, 2017 at 3:10 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 5, 2017 at 9:51 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 5, 2017 at 10:06 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 11:36 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 5, 2017 at 11:44 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 7, 2017 at 3:22 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 5, 2017 at 9:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 3, 2017 at 8:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 3, 2017 at 8:59 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 3, 2017 at 1:25 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 10, 2017 at 7:43 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 1, 2017 at 3:28 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 4:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 1, 2017 at 9:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 2, 2017 at 1:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by brewer - May 2, 2017 at 7:28 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gemini - May 7, 2017 at 6:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 2, 2017 at 7:38 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 11:35 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 2, 2017 at 10:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 2, 2017 at 10:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 3, 2017 at 12:08 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 3, 2017 at 6:14 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by vorlon13 - May 3, 2017 at 8:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Gawdzilla Sama - May 4, 2017 at 7:58 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 5, 2017 at 12:31 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 7, 2017 at 5:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Simon Moon - May 7, 2017 at 11:41 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 7, 2017 at 2:53 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 8, 2017 at 5:30 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 8:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 8, 2017 at 2:24 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 9, 2017 at 10:22 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 10:35 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 9, 2017 at 11:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 12:18 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 12:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 1:20 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 2:11 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 2:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Aroura - May 9, 2017 at 2:45 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:06 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:21 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:30 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:34 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 9, 2017 at 4:44 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:46 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 4:35 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 9, 2017 at 4:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 8:40 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 10, 2017 at 4:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 10, 2017 at 6:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 5:28 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 11, 2017 at 10:39 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Paraselene - May 11, 2017 at 10:42 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Angrboda - May 11, 2017 at 12:40 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 11, 2017 at 1:01 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 9, 2017 at 5:16 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 9, 2017 at 5:27 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Harry Nevis - May 10, 2017 at 10:42 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Minimalist - May 7, 2017 at 3:39 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 8, 2017 at 9:14 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 9:47 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 3:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Crunchy - May 8, 2017 at 8:19 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 9:55 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 8, 2017 at 11:34 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 8, 2017 at 11:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fireball - May 9, 2017 at 10:23 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 4:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 9, 2017 at 10:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Little Rik - May 10, 2017 at 3:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 9:21 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 10, 2017 at 6:56 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 8:47 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 10, 2017 at 4:10 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 5:52 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 10:31 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 2:10 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 2:44 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Mister Agenda - May 10, 2017 at 4:58 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 10, 2017 at 5:08 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 6:59 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 8:23 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Paraselene - May 10, 2017 at 8:49 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by The Valkyrie - May 10, 2017 at 8:51 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Paraselene - May 10, 2017 at 8:53 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Cyberman - May 10, 2017 at 9:00 pm

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 9:29 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Paraselene - May 10, 2017 at 9:30 pm

Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by LadyForCamus - May 10, 2017 at 9:37 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 10, 2017 at 9:57 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 10, 2017 at 10:49 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Fake Messiah - May 11, 2017 at 6:16 am

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 4:46 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Neo-Scholastic - May 11, 2017 at 3:15 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 11, 2017 at 8:26 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 7:48 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Amarok - May 11, 2017 at 8:42 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by comet - May 13, 2017 at 9:00 pm

RE: Why science and religious fatih need not be in conflict: It's as easy as 1-2-3! - by Whateverist - May 15, 2017 at 9:05 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Why is Jesus Circumcised and not the rest of the christians ?	Megabullshit	25	15896	May 13, 2025 at 8:23 am Last Post: awty
	Science and Theism Doesn't Work out right?	Hellomate1234	28	6961	November 7, 2024 at 8:12 am Last Post: syntheticadrenaline
	Is Atheism a Religion? Why or why not?	Nishant Xavier	91	20817	August 6, 2023 at 1:38 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence	LinuxGal	5	2421	October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm Last Post: LinuxGal
	Why do you not believe in the concept of a God?	johndoe122931	110	28662	June 19, 2021 at 12:21 pm Last Post: Mermaid
	Why do psychologists need religion?	Interaktive	17	5021	May 16, 2021 at 11:47 am Last Post: Jehanne
	"Why is it reasonable to believe in prisons, but not in the hell?"	FlatAssembler	124	28340	February 19, 2021 at 12:11 pm Last Post: The Grand Nudger
	Atheists: I have tips of advice why you are a hated non religious dogmatic group inUS	Rinni92	13	6262	August 5, 2020 at 3:43 pm Last Post: Sal
	Why not deism?	Inqwizitor	200	49122	July 17, 2020 at 5:31 am Last Post: Porcupine
	[Not Even A Little Bit Serious] Why AREN'T You An Atheist?	BrianSoddingBoru4	28	9168	December 28, 2019 at 12:48 pm Last Post: LastPoet

View a Printable Version

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me