On an existential level every belief rests on “as-if” pre-commitments. My personal opinion is that those atheists who consider atheism rational in contrast to theism, which they consider irrational, do so because they adhere to Enlightenment-era classical foundationalism. Their position is that knowledge is warranted only if it traces back to either self-evident principles or incorrigible experiences. Generally they believe that these two basics exhaust all possible options. That may or may not be the case. Either way, there are strains of skepticism that will deny one or both of those propositions to one degree or another. Even before someone can apply the methodology of classical foundationalism, each person must make private and pre-rational existential choices about: 1) whether or not reason is effective and 2) whether or not the world is intelligible. Again, you will find that there are strains of skepticism that will deny one or both of those propositions to one degree or another.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: June 29, 2024, 4:01 am
Thread Rating:
Faith and "Truth vs Utility"
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
You Know, Truth Be Told. | Minimalist | 7 | 3260 |
July 9, 2017 at 7:46 pm Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4 |
|
The Truth contest, Essential Oils and New Age Spirituality | AceBoogie | 51 | 11833 |
November 19, 2016 at 4:02 am Last Post: Alex K |
|
Jodo Shinshu view on faith | TheViolentFemme | 11 | 4471 |
June 12, 2013 at 4:29 pm Last Post: John V |
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)