RE: There might be another copy of you 10^10^29 Metres away.
July 18, 2011 at 7:22 am
(This post was last modified: July 18, 2011 at 7:26 am by Napoléon.)
Lol, I'll just pretend I understood all of that...
Admittedly I didn't read the whole thing but I get the gist, so what this is saying is that it is more simple to have parallel universes, than not to have them? Is that correct?
Or is that a mere assumption?
Sorry, I'm just trying to understand a lot of what was in there.
Admittedly I didn't read the whole thing but I get the gist, so what this is saying is that it is more simple to have parallel universes, than not to have them? Is that correct?
Quote:A common feature of all four multiverse levels is that
the simplest and arguably most elegant theory involves
parallel universes by default. To deny the existence of
those universes, one needs to complicate the theory by
adding experimentally unsupported processes and ad hoc
postulates: finite space, wave function collapse, ontological
asymmetry, etc.
Or is that a mere assumption?
Sorry, I'm just trying to understand a lot of what was in there.
