RE: morality is subjective and people don't have free will
May 17, 2017 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2017 at 7:41 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
(May 17, 2017 at 7:30 am)mh.brewer Wrote: Blah, blah, blah. Didn't read a word.
Well... I never thought you'd be one to troll. I just wasted all my time trying to discuss with you for you to say "blah, blah, blah. Didn't read a word." after repeatedly misrepresenting my position.
I should either stay out of debates with you or just put you on ignore.
Your response is basically the fact that you can't deal with my arguments.
It's a pity you didn't read because the end of my post is a concise Q.E.D. against your position given by Galen Strawson.
(May 17, 2017 at 10:05 am)Neo-Scholastic Wrote:(May 16, 2017 at 8:21 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: If you want to posit the non-physical as an explanation, go out and find me this non-physical.
This demand begs the question.
What question does it supposedly beg?
Quote:What we call physical is inferred from intellect and experience.
Intellect and experience are also physical.
(May 17, 2017 at 10:16 am)SteveII Wrote:(May 17, 2017 at 12:10 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: If gawd knows without error what you will freely choose, then you are helpless to make a different choice.
If gawd knows without error you're going to wear a red shirt tomorrow, you cannot wear the blue one. What you're left with, under the auspices of an omnipotent, omniscient gawd, is merely the illusion of free will.
I was going to answer but hit backspace until it was deleted. Using "gawd" is obnoxious and I don't discuss things with obnoxious people.
Looks to me like once again gawd's followers are offended on His behalf when He's called silly names.
