RE: Greatest Mysteries
July 19, 2011 at 7:32 pm
(This post was last modified: July 19, 2011 at 7:33 pm by Statler Waldorf.)
(July 19, 2011 at 7:25 pm)Shell B Wrote:(July 19, 2011 at 7:16 pm)Statler Waldorf Wrote: Yeah Jack is a good one. Zodiac is just interesting because the circumstantial evidence all pointed to Arthur Lee, but none of the forensic evidence really did. I think it could have been two men working together..
That's actually quite rare, but not unheard of. For me, it doubles the chances that one would get caught, so I'm not sure I like that guess, but it is not impossible.
Very true, and if one got caught he could rat the other one out very easily in order to get a more lenient sentence. Although it does make warrants and arrests more difficult because the police have evidence that just doesn't seem to match up. Arthur Lee spelled words funny just like in the Zodiac letters, he had a Zodiac watch that had the same symbol as used in the letters, he wore the same boots that were the same size, he was in the area of all the killings, his favorite book was the book mentioned in the letters, he supposedly told a friend he was going to call himself the Zodiac, and he fit the serial killer profile (white male in his thirties very high IQ) but his handwriting didn't match the letters and his finger prints didn't match the print found at one of the scenes. So he was never arrested for the murders. It’s a good mystery because it doesn’t really add up.
