(June 9, 2017 at 4:01 pm)Aegon Wrote:(June 5, 2017 at 8:42 pm)Minimalist Wrote: How exactly did they "choose" her?
Like this
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/damaging-...d=40852448
(June 9, 2017 at 1:47 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: Trump is doing great, even with the DNC hindering MAGA. Stock market is soaring, bad deals are being canceled, unemployment going down. The best part is the DNC is becoming obsolete, and splintered into a hundred pieces and will never be put back together. I mean if you are someone who reads rawstory, I can understand the Trump derangement syndrome is causing confusion and not seeing how great things are. Most people that hate Trump are brainwashed by establishment media, and really repeat talking points. They construct conspiracy theories, and feel like the world is going to end. It's truly amazing. The DNC is being sued by multiple states. Problem is most people are so focused on Trump and everything the news says, the world is passing them by. Lead, follow or get the fuck out of the way. The whole Russian collusion conspiracy never really existed, except from the mouth of the DNC who had to find someone to blame for such a huge loss.
I know acronyms can be hard, but you misspelled CIA, FBI, and NSA in the part I bolded. You think the DNC just fabricated it and everyone in the intelligence community was like, "Ok"?
The FBI was never allowed by the DNC to look at their servers. The investigation came from crowdstrike. The Russians probably did breach the servers at some point, and just as cyberwarfare has been going on for many years. It's not like the US doesn't do the same thing. Weeping angel is the program the US uses. The NSA, CIA, and FBI are not saying Donald Trump was working with the Russian government. It's Clinton's failed campaign that started this whole story to explain why their emails ended up in wikileaks hands. Really it was just to distract people from all the crimes, lack of ethics, and Clinton email scandal. Julian Assange said it was not the Russian government. There is no evidence. It's just a conspiracy theory, and really just follows the rules for radicals, which the DNC follows. And the Russians didn't do anything. If they did give the emails to wikileaks, then all they did was show the DNC was so corrupt that it led to Debbie Wasserman Schultz having to step down.
The Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky
- "Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have." Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. "Have-Nots" must build power from flesh and blood.
- "Never go outside the expertise of your people." It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
- "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy." Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
- "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules." If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
- "Ridicule is man's most potent weapon." There is no defense. It's irrational. It's infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
- "A good tactic is one your people enjoy." They'll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They're doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
- "A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag." Don't become old news.
- "Keep the pressure on. Never let up." Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
- "The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself." Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
- "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition." It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
- "If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive." Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
- "The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative." Never let the enemy score points because you're caught without a solution to the problem.
- "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
