RE: I guess the L stands for Liberal
June 10, 2017 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: June 10, 2017 at 3:35 pm by Aroura.)
To be inclusive does not mean you accept absolutely anything and everything, particularly things that themselves are exclusive.
This is some form of reducto absurdum. It is silly to say, oh, the gays don't accept someone who represents anti-gay agendas, what hypocrites! Of course they don't.
This is simply the same old biggots crying that people will not tolerate their intolerance. Well, duh.
Would you expect a march for Black Lives Matter to accept a member of the KKK in their march? How about a kids BarMmitzvah celebration welcoming a sign carrying neo-nazi? A 9-11 remembrance ceremony should make sure the guy with the "death to america" sign has a place right up front. Amiright?
It is not different. Someone who actively supports a group, in this case our current admin, that is actively, this very moment, seeking to do them harm, is obviously not welcome, nor should they be.
Your arguments are flawed. I would not expect a private Christian group to accept a group from the rally for reason, even. It isn't one sided, you are all just desperate to make the the left center appear as hypocritical as the far right.
To be clear, it isn't simply about who a person voted for, and trying to paint it that way shows both your ignorance and desperation.
He voted for, and still currently supports, someone who is actively trying to harm them. Key words being currently, active and harm.
Take your reducto absurdum and your reek of desperation elsewhere.
This is some form of reducto absurdum. It is silly to say, oh, the gays don't accept someone who represents anti-gay agendas, what hypocrites! Of course they don't.
This is simply the same old biggots crying that people will not tolerate their intolerance. Well, duh.
Would you expect a march for Black Lives Matter to accept a member of the KKK in their march? How about a kids BarMmitzvah celebration welcoming a sign carrying neo-nazi? A 9-11 remembrance ceremony should make sure the guy with the "death to america" sign has a place right up front. Amiright?
It is not different. Someone who actively supports a group, in this case our current admin, that is actively, this very moment, seeking to do them harm, is obviously not welcome, nor should they be.
Your arguments are flawed. I would not expect a private Christian group to accept a group from the rally for reason, even. It isn't one sided, you are all just desperate to make the the left center appear as hypocritical as the far right.
To be clear, it isn't simply about who a person voted for, and trying to paint it that way shows both your ignorance and desperation.
He voted for, and still currently supports, someone who is actively trying to harm them. Key words being currently, active and harm.
Take your reducto absurdum and your reek of desperation elsewhere.
“Eternity is a terrible thought. I mean, where's it going to end?”
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
― Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead
