(June 25, 2017 at 8:50 pm)Little Henry Wrote: I found it really funny that you all people attacked that quote about morality and evolution because it came from William Lane Craig.
It actually came from Michael Ruse, who is actually atheist.
Uh...I didn't. I don't give a shit who said what. Is the content valid? That's what matters. Unlike the bible, which only gets people on its side because they think a specific source is responsible for it. Take that away and even you'd agree with us. But that makes the position dishonest and naive since that forces a believer to hold value in the identity of the author and not the content.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
