(June 25, 2017 at 11:05 pm)Tizheruk Wrote:(June 25, 2017 at 10:52 pm)mh.brewer Wrote: Sorry, my mistake. Found it in an article by WLC. Does it matter who you took it from without giving credit? Or do you plan to dodge and by default take the moral high ground?
It's practically the same argument as criags and still is just as silly as atheists are perfectly capable of saying stupid things
Again...why so much importance placed on the identity of the speaker? The content of the message is what matters.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
