(June 29, 2017 at 11:28 am)Parsim0ny Wrote:(June 29, 2017 at 11:21 am)Astreja Wrote: Simple. Organisms with unreliable minds are more likely to die out, leaving a gene pool of more reliable minds.
This is an astonishing claim to make. I cannot trust a monkey to perform a heart surgery in my chest, even if it means that these monkeys are capable of selectively improving their fingers movements and become "more" reliable.
Which is why we only trust humans to do that. Or, some humans. And force them to go through years of medical school before we trust them to do that. And if they can't hack it, they don't get to go and tinker with our tickers. Why are you theists always so absolutely horrible at making analogies? I mean, that should be like the easiest (even for YOU) type of apologetic technique and you always, consistently, embarrassingly, blow it.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
