Quote:If a woman has full bodily autonomy then the natural conclusion to that arguement is that a woman can destroy the infant-in-situ at anypoint upto and including mere moments before it's natural delivery. Afterall she should have absolute control over any and all procedures she undergoes then why should this not be permissible for any reason and at all times? If your moral compass leads you to the belief that this outcome is morally acceptable then I would very much like to have a seperate discussion with you (please contact me directly either for a PM or to set up a different thread) as to why and more importantly at what point you believe it would be immoral to destroy an infant {is it the moment they are out of the woman's body or some point after?} This is not an attack, I have heard both arguments and just want to know where you may be coming from.
This is generally my position although I don't apply "morality" ( WTF you may mean by that ) into it at all. I submit that it is simply none of my business if a woman does or does not want to have and raise a kid.
And it is none of your business either.
Neither is what consenting adults do in private.
