RE: Is atheism self-contradictory ?
July 3, 2017 at 8:04 am
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2017 at 8:05 am by YouOnlyLiveTwice.)
I'm almost certain that somebody's already said this, but it's perfectly fine logic to disregard the existence of God as nothing more than an unproven assumption on the grounds that it lacks any objective, empirical evidence. It's not just that God can't be proven by logic; he can't be proven by any consistently reliable objective means.
It can be assumed that we possess the elementary skills necessary to distinguish between reality and fantasy, or else this discussion is pointless (not to mention the same logic calls theists' claims into question as well).
So no, there's nothing self-contradictory about the logic of atheism, but there is something self-contradictory about your own logic, OP.
It can be assumed that we possess the elementary skills necessary to distinguish between reality and fantasy, or else this discussion is pointless (not to mention the same logic calls theists' claims into question as well).
So no, there's nothing self-contradictory about the logic of atheism, but there is something self-contradictory about your own logic, OP.
![Smile Smile](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/smile.gif)